<h3>Use of military surveillance drones overhead would be un-American</h3>
<p><img src="images/stories/napolitano2.jpg" border="0" alt="Judge Andrew Napolitano" hspace="7" align="left" />For the past few weeks, I have been writing in this column about the government’s use of drones and challenging their constitutionality on <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/fox-news-channel/">Fox News Channel</a>, where I work. I once asked on air what <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/thomas-jefferson/">Thomas Jefferson</a> would have done if - had they existed at the time - <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/george-iii/">King George III</a> had sent drones to peer inside the bedroom windows of <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/monticello/">Monticello</a>. I suspect <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/thomas-jefferson/">Jefferson</a> and his household would have trained their muskets on the drones and taken them down. I offer this historical anachronism as a hypothetical only, not as someone who is urging the use of violence against the government.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jun/7/big-brothers-all-seeing-eye/">Continue on Washington Times &gt;&gt;&gt;</a></p>