<p>While some have expressed surprise at <a href="http://freedomoutpost.com/?p=1530" target="_blank">Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s response</a> to the issue of regulating arms, what he said should really be no surprise. In fact, he has said much the same thing in the past. In light of the response to the Aurora shooting and the current talk in the media over gun control, especially involving AK-47s, it makes me wonder what owners of such weapons would do if they were suddenly outlawed.</p>
<p>Scalia was on to speak about his new book <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Reading-Law-Interpretation-Legal-Texts/dp/031427555X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1343659170&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=scalia" target="_blank">Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts</a></em>. In doing so, he took on several issues, including a <a href="http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/07/justice-antonin-scalia-speaks-out-on-fox-news-sunday/" target="_blank">two and a half minute segment</a> to speak in regards to whether the U.S. Constitution will allow for regulations or gun control laws.</p>
<p>Chris Wallace had asked in regards to regulations such as high capacity magazine or other assault weapons whether they could be regulated Constitutionally. The National Journal<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/scalia-guns-may-be-regulated-20120729" target="_blank"> reports</a>,</p>
<p>{source}<span style="font-family: courier new, courier, monospace;"><br /><span>&lt;</span>iframe width="420" height="235" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/g3oxckyicBY?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen<span>&gt;</span><span>&lt;</span>/iframe<span>&gt;</span><br /></span>{/source}<br /><br />Read more: <a href="http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/07/what-will-owners-of-ak-47s-do-if-they-are-outlawed/#ixzz22A3bALcy" style="color: #003399;">http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/07/what-will-owners-of-ak-47s-do-if-they-are-outlawed/#ixzz22A3bALcy</a></p>