<p><img src="http://cdn.breitbart.com/_res/img/logo.png" border="0" alt="Breitbart Logo" hspace="7" width="93" height="72" align="left" /></p>
<h3>Last Thursday, Breitbart News' Mike Flynn <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/02/obama-campaign-sues-to-restrict-military-voting" target="_blank">broke the news</a> that the Obama campaign was suing in the swing state of Ohio to block a law that extends early voting for members of the military for an additional three days. A fierce battle erupted, with Democrats (and <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/03/obama-democrats-suing-to-block-military-voting-in-ohio/" target="_blank">a few conservatives</a>) arguing that Obama campaign was simply trying to extend the military's privilege to everyone else. Regardless of the remedy they seek, Flynn points out, they are suing to end an exemption for military voters. It would not be the first time Democrats--who pretend, in their fight against voter ID, to want more ballot access--have tried to stop the military's votes from counting.</h3>
<p>In 2008, for example, the State of Virginia (a critical swing state in 2012) had <a href="http://www.thenextright.com/soren-dayton/is-the-fairfax-county-va-registrar-suppressing-the-military-vote" target="_blank">failed</a> to send absentee ballots to members of the military on active duty in time for them to complete the ballots and return them before the election. When the campaign of Republican nominee Sen. John McCain sued to compel the state to count military ballots that had arrived after election day, the State Board of Elections--then run by Democrats, appointed by a Democratic governor--argued, effectively, that it could send absentee ballots to the military a day before the election and still be in compliance with the law.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/05/Democrats-Versus-Military-Voters-Not-the-First-Time">Continue post at Brietbart.com &gt;&gt;&gt;</a></p>